Saturday, June 27, 2020

TBI and PTSD: Not Just Headaches

(USMC Photo by Tyler L. Main)
Review by Bill Doughty–

In "Military Mental Health Care: A Guide for Service Members, Veterans, Families, and Community" (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2013), authors Cheryl Lawhorne-Scott and Don Philpott offer no-nonsense, clear-eyed information as well as advice and resources.

This book tackles serious issues, both physical and mental, beginning with the first chapter: "Traumatic Brain Injury." Starting on page one: "Blasts are a leading cause of TBI for active duty military personnel in war zones."
"One of the most common observations reported by families of service members originally not diagnosed with mTBI (concussion) is that upon return from deployment, they 'have changed.' Classic neurological and cognitive symptoms of mTBI that should be recognized and discussed with medical professionals include: reduced reaction time, decision-making difficulties, decreased memory and forgetfulness, attention and concentration difficulties, ... personality changes, impulsiveness, anger, sadness, depression..."
Art created by a service member recovering from PTSD, from the Southwestern University art gallery.

The authors offer the full "who, what, when, where and why" about TBI and mTBI and also the "how": How it develops, how it manifests and how to deal with it, including any anxiety, panic, flashbacks, rage, sleep interruption and difficulty concentrating; also, how it is treated.

Chapters include various stress-related mental health issues, sexual trauma and hazing, and suicide and homelessness. Chapter 15, "Resilience," and Chapter 16, "Health and Wellness" offer holistic help for individuals and families, with practical tips to get and remain healthy and fit. Several pages are dedicated to influenza and vaccinations.

BASETRACK Live is a two-person, multimedia documentary that tells the story of Marine Cpl. AJ Czubai’s 2010 deployment with the 1st Battalion, 8th Marines, to Afghanistan’s Helmand Province. The story centers on Czubai and his wife, Melissa, as they both try to readjust and cope to post-deployment challenges, including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), marriage difficulties, alcohol abuse and suicide. Serving as a backdrop, but integral to the story, is journalistic footage and interviews with other members of his unit, as well as with Family members. Photographs of the Marines and the Afghanistan people are also projected on stage accompanied by a haunting, but electrify musical score. The production has toured in 40 cities across the United States since its 2014 debut. (Photo by Gloria Montgomery)

Lawhorne-Scott and Philpott include special mention of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and recognizing/confronting stigma in order to get help:
"Mental health problems are not a sign of weakness. The reality is that injuries, including psychological injuries, affect the strong and brave just like everyone else. Some of the most successful officers and enlisted personnel have experienced these problems. But stigma about mental health issues can be a huge barrier for people who need help. Finding the solution to your problem is a sign of strength and maturity. Getting assistance from others is sometimes the only way to solve something. For example, if you cannot scale a wall on you own and need comrades to do so, you use them! Knowing when and how to get help is actually part of military training."
At the end of each chapter and at the back of the book, they offer reputable online resources for more information. They acknowledge especially VA and DOD resources. The VA offers a bundle of resources through a PTSD website.

"Military Mental Health Care" is an excellent Navy Reads selection for June –– PTSD Month.

The authors intend for their book to fit in with each service branch's Total Force Fitness concept of health, resilience and human performance. "TFF is not a 'How To' manual," they write in the foreword, "but rather a user-friendly, equal opportunity framework to building a behavior, discipline and level of fitness that sustains a lifestyle of resiliency."

TBI and PTSD can be more than just headaches, and there is help for survivors.

Friday, June 19, 2020

Junge on Leadership II – CAPT Crozier?

By Bill Doughty–

Crozier, then-CO of USS Blue Ridge at a candlelight service in 2018.
In early April we posted a review of Michael Junge's "Crimes of Command," a book that analyzes the U.S. Navy's history of responsibility, accountability, culpability, punishment and forgiveness. We followed up that review with an interview with the author, incorporating initial news of the firing of CAPT Brett Crozier, CO of USS Theodore Roosevelt.

Today (Friday night) the Navy announced the results of a follow-on investigation of how Crozier and other leaders acted to get TR sailors to safety. In Orwellian reasoning, the investigation concludes: “(Crozier) should have been focused on doing everything he could to slow transmission of COVID-19 by moving Sailors ashore.”

The firing of CAPT Crozier, subsequent mishandling by then-acting SECNAV Modly, heavy-handed commentary by POTUS, and today's announcement blaming Crozier presents a case study in leadership and decision-making. CAPT Crozier's case dovetails with some of Professor Junge's insights.

We return for another interview with CAPT Junge. What are his thoughts about Crozier and Modly, undue command influence by the commander in chief, civilian control of the military, and what it means to be a good leader.

I am including photos of CAPT Crozier – including some prior to his position as CO of USS Theodore Roosevelt when he was executive officer of USS Ronald Reagan and then-CO of USS Blue Ridge, flagship of U.S. 7th Fleet.



Crozier flies the Retention Excellence Award (REA) for  2017
BD: What does the CNO's conclusion about CAPT Crozier say, in context of "Crimes of Command" –– responsibility, accountability, culpability? What are your thoughts about the final outcome of the investigation?

MJ: Initial reporting on this was...awful.  CNN reported “in a major reversal” even though the Navy never officially made changes to the actions taken in early April. What is interesting is placing responsibility with Admiral Baker but (reportedly) leaving out the staffs and other shore commanders.

The very fact that there were rumors of CNO Gilday recommending Crozier’s reinstatement go a long way to recognizing that sometimes senior people err when removing a commander, and even if the removal wasn’t in error that sometimes things can change in the operating environment which allow senior commanders to reconsider decisions.

Other than that, I’m concerned that we once again saw a single office investigation conducted via phone and email instead of a board of inquiry conducted in theater. The Navy conducted multiple boards during World War II yet we haven’t seen one within the Navy in the last two decades. I’m working on an opinion piece that will flesh this commentary out some more.

BD: You've said 'ethics' implies "a level of autonomy that requires decision-making, while 'rules' do not." Was Crozier showing the essence of ethical leadership? From what we know, could he have done things differently?

MJ: I believe Captain Crozier showed ethical leadership. He made a moral judgement, he articulated why he made that judgement and sent that argument and conclusion up the chain of command.

Could he have done things differently? Of course, that is always an option. But, could he have done things differently and still gotten the desired and necessary result for his crew? I think that is unlikely. Looking at the responses to shipboard cases after Crozier’s letter he was prescient in his recommendations.


Crozier, then-CO of USS Blue Ridge, observes as the ship departs from dry dock, Jan. 21, 2018. (MC3 Patrick Semales)

BD: What were among Acting SECNAV Modly's mistakes and failures as a leader in handling the crisis?

MJ: Modly did exactly what he accused Crozier of – he was emotional, took the email’s leak as a personal betrayal, and allowed the complexity of his challenge with the COVID breakout on the ship to overwhelm his ability to act professionally, when acting professionally was what was needed most. He compounded this error with the incomprehensible flight to Guam and speech to the crew.

What a leader should have done was not take any of the actions by captain and crew as a personal affront. A leader should have stepped back, thought of what was right for the institution and separate that feeling from personal concerns or fears of appearance or senior judgement of a decision or action.

Capt. Brett E. Crozier, then-commanding officer of the U.S. 7th Fleet flagship USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19), shows then-Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer and his wife, Polly Spencer, the bridge during a tour of the ship, July 12, 2018. Spencer met with leadership and spoke with the crew. Blue Ridge and her crew have now entered a final upkeep and training phase in preparation to become fully mission capable for operations. (MC2 Jordan KirkJohnson)

BD: What does the Crozier/TR incident say about Navy culture? Is there a possibility that it will have a chilling effect on bold leadership?

MJ: I think it will definitely have a chilling effect on leadership in general, not just bold leadership. In and of itself, these actions wouldn’t be much. When combined with two oft-repeated statements in the wake of the 2017 collisions and subsequent reports the signal – intended or not – is clear “do your job and don’t ask or question.”

Capt. Brett Crozier, then-executive officer of the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), visits the ship’s barbershop and gets a haircut April 30, 2015 from Ship’s Serviceman Seaman Apprentice Hailey Carlisle. Reagan was underway conducting carrier qualifications. (MC3 Timothy Schumaker)


CO CAPT Crozier washes crew's dishes aboard TR for Thanksgiving.
BD: Does undue influence at the highest levels – including the CINC – hurt the Navy's culture? We've seen several instances such as the overturning of Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher's conviction and subsequent ousting of SECNAV Richard Spencer. What are your thoughts on how this affects Navy culture?

MJ: Undue influence is only a problem when the subordinate leader allows that influence to affect judgment or action. If the first thought is “what will my boss think” then there is a problem, but it’s not the senior’s problem. But, the senior created the problem and must act proactively to solve it, if the senior desires to. Sometimes senior influence is necessary to right a wrong – sometimes different people have different ideas of what right or wrong is.

There is a great article called “Lawful Command Influence” that speaks to the “appropriate actions commanders or staff members can take within the military justice process to ensure good order and discipline is maintained within the ranks.” And this is not a new issue for any military service or government – it just is.

As different people and generations and legal regimes change, as norms alter, we have to relearn what is proper, right, and correct within the law. But, in general the right and proper thing hasn’t changed much in the past century. The biggest changes in legal action are around race, gender, and sexuality – but what was right and wrong really isn’t different.

Capt. Brett Crozier, center, then-executive officer of USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), and retired Marine Corps Lt. Col. Raymond Swalley, World War II veteran, shake hands in the ship’s hangar bay during a ship tour. Swalley served as a pilot aboard USS Bunker Hill (CV-17) during WWII. (MC3 McFarlane)

Meeting Commander United States Forces Korea, Gen. Vincent K. Brooks, 2018.
BD: How tenuous is civilian control of the military? Why is this important in a free democracy? How can it be made stronger?

MJ: Civilian control is imperative in a democracy or any free government and I do not think it is at all tenuous. The best way to make it stronger is to encourage open and vigorous discussion, even debate.

I’ve seen too many adherents to civ-mil relations dismiss another point of view because the individual making it is military and not academic, or academic and not military, or not-Huntington, or something other than actually addressing the core argument.

I think it is also important to keep the work of civ-mil relations limited to the linkage between the military and civilian government.  Many now conflate the concept of civ-mil to include civil society and it shouldn’t.

There should be a study of the military’s relationship to society (and vice versa) but it shouldn’t be civ-mil – that’s military to civilian government. Likewise, there should be study of society’s relationship towards government.

Harry Summers [author of "On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War" (1982)"] misunderstood much of Clausewitz, but his redefined trinity has some value and the relationships between and among military, government, and society need discussion.*

Capt. Brett E. Crozier, then-commanding officer of the U.S. 7th Fleet flagship USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19), welcomes members of the Japan Self-Defense Force Joint Staff College for a tour aboard the ship, Sept. 18, 2018. (MC2 Adam K. Thomas)

BD: Similarly, why is it critical to keep an independent and strong Navy – as bold leaders fought for 70 years ago in the Revolt of the Admirals?

MJ: If we want to “play the away game” and be proactive about it, then we need a Navy. A strong Navy. It’s too late to start building a Navy after the first shots are fired.

The founders understood this and is why the Constitution requires that Congress must “maintain a Navy” and “raise an Army” though there is a lot of latitude there.

Another important leader who understood this was Franklin D. Roosevelt. He began a Navy buildup in 1934 - with further authorizations in 1938 and 1940 with a planned military capability for 1943, and that’s the path the USA followed in the war. 

Capt. Christopher Bolt, left, then-CO of USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), shakes hands with Capt. Brett Crozier, Ronald Reagan's then-Executive Officer, in celebration of his final arrested landing as command officer of Ronald Reagan, Sept. 15, 2015. (MC3 Ryan McFarlane)


Then-USS Reagan XO CAPT Crozier participates in general quarters drill in 2015. (MC3 N. Burke)
BD: You have expressed controversial opinions, including in your analysis and studies at the Naval War College, about how the Navy can continue to improve. How are you able to show such courage, and why is it important to provide unvarnished truth?

MJ: I’m not sure it’s courage so much as stubbornness and a little brashness. I have always believed in three things – intellectual honesty (truth), personal choice, and seeing the world the way it could be. I rarely press for a world as it “should” be, because that violates personal choice. I don’t like fooling people into doing something because that’s not intellectually honest.

As a Navy and a profession we are either strong, confident, and honest enough to choose telling the truth – varnished or not – or we aren’t. (See Q5 for some linkage here)

If leaders aren't strong enough to speak “truth to power” then are they really leading? Or are they really just good and diligent followers? And, when someone asks an “uncomfortable question” or “speaks truth to power” leaders need to ask themselves – why is this question uncomfortable? Why is someone disagreeing with me? That’s the secret part of humility as a leader – being open to the idea that you don’t have all the answers, which means listening to and considering critics.

Capt. Brett Crozier, commanding officer of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), addresses local news media at Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, Jan. 17, 2020. The Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group was on a scheduled deployment to the Indo-Pacific. (MCSN Kaylianna Genier)

BD: Overall, it seems the Navy has done a remarkable job responding to the COVID-19 crisis, from informing the fleet and families, deploying USNS Mercy and USNS Comfort, providing Navy Medicine personnel, and dealing with deployments. How important is coronavirus testing of Sailors and Navy civilians to keeping readiness at the highest level?

MJ: I really try and stay out of the COVID discussions – we learn so much every day that what is said tomorrow is likely either wrong or out of context by tomorrow or the next week.  What we must do is remain vigilant, remain flexible, and clearly recognize that the world has changed and seek to capitalize on that change rather than an attempt at returning to the status quo ante.

BD: Thank you for a list of books and authors in our first interview. Expanding on that, what books do you recommend specifically on virtue, especially for Navy readers? As you said, "seeking virtue is a lifelong quest." Would you also share your recommended maritime books and authors?

MJ: 

Virtue:

"After Virtue," Alisdair Macintyre
"The Character Gap," Christian Miller
"Practical Wisdom," Barry Schwartz

Maritime Books:

Tom Clancy's "Hunt For Red October, Red Storm Rising"
David Poyer’s Dan Lenson Series
PT Deutermann's “Scorpion in the Sea” 
Herman Wouk: “The Caine Mutiny,” “Winds of War” and “War and Remembrance”

--------------------------

Just the titles of Junge's recommendations – "After Virtue," "Practical Wisdom" and "The Character Gap" – resonate in this COVID era of fear, mistrust of science, and the erosion of rule of law, integrity and leadership norms.

A big thank you to CAPT Junge for sharing his time and insights with Navy Reads, an unofficial blog in support of reading, critical thinking and the Navy's Professional Reading Program. Also, thank you to the mass communication specialists who helped show CAPT Crozier at the bridge, deck plates and in key leadership positions. Crozier is a profile in courage.


U.S. 7th Fleet flagship USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19) CO, CAPT Brett E. Crozier, speaks with Medal of Honor recipient Maj. Gen. (ret.) James E. Livingston during a Morale Welfare and Recreation tour aboard the ship, Aug. 17, 2018, in Yokosuka, Japan. Livingston was awarded the Medal of Honor for his heroic actions during battle in the Vietnam War and spent time aboard Blue Ridge after the emergency evacuation of Saigon in 1975. (MC2 Adam K. Thomas)





Harry G. Summers was interviewed at the Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley, in 1996 and responded to point of view of the founders' intent of the military to be controlled by the people and their representatives, acknowledging that it was "implicit in their design for our government." Summers said, "Yes, and explicit as well in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, which makes it very clear that the American military is a creature of the Congress, not of the executive branch. The Congress has absolute power over its very existence. Clausewitz laid it out in the early nineteenth century when he differentiated between eighteenth-century war – which was a matter for kings and presidents and princes, and the people were just observers – and nineteenth-century war as a matter of what he called "the remarkable trinity of the people, the government, and the army." That observation, a very profound observation that he drew out of the French Revolution, had been drawn almost fifty years earlier in the American Revolution and incorporated into our Constitution. We are a trinitarian military in the true sense of the word – which has enormous ramifications for the commitment of U.S. military power and for U.S. military policy."

Capt. Brett Crozier, left, commanding officer of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), receives the national ensign from Personnel Specialist 1st Class Susan Figueroa, from Bronx, N.Y., during a burial at sea Jan. 20, 2020. The Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group was on a scheduled deployment in the Indo-Pacific. (MCSN Dylan Lavin)


Thursday, June 18, 2020

The Naval Inspiration of Frederick Douglass

By Bill Doughty

The most famous slave in United States history had a strong and deep connection to the maritime domain.

As a young man Frederick Douglass gazed wistfully at the bay; while traveling under bondage he carefully studied the waterway and imagined his escape; as a young man he worked in a shipyard caulking wooden frigates; working in the shipyard helped him learn to read; when he made his escape he impersonated a sailor and found shelter in a sailor-friendly port; and, while he was alone and homeless, another sailor helped him and led him to abolitionists who helped Douglass survive and thrive.

In his "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass" (Published at the Anti-Slavery Office, Boston; 1845) Douglass describes standing on the bank of the "noble" Chesapeake Bay, "ever white with sails from every quarter of the habitable globe."
"Those beautiful vessels, robed in purest white, so delightful to the eye of the freemen, were to me so many shrouded ghosts, to terrify and torment me with thoughts of my wretched condition. I have of ten, in the deep stillness of a summer's Sabbath, stood all alone upon the lofty banks of that noble bay, and traced, with saddened heart and tearful eye, the countless number of sails moving off to the mighty ocean. The sight of these always affected me powerfully ... I would pour out my soul's complaint, in my rude way, with an apostrophe to the moving multitude of ships: 'You are loosed from your moorings, and are free; I am fast in my chains, and am a slave! You move merrily before the gentle gale, and I sadly before the bloody whip! You are freedom's swift-winged angels, that fly round the world; I am confined in bands of iron! O that I were free! O, that I were on one of your gallant decks, and under your protecting wing!'"
1800s-era sailing boat on Chesapeake Bay (NHHC)
Douglass daydreams about swimming out to the ships, if only he could swim. He then imagines taking a canoe and heading from Baltimore to Delaware and Pennsylvania.

Imagery of the sea abound in his "Narrative" and subsequent "My Escape from Slavery":
"We sailed out of Miles River for Baltimore on a Saturday morning. I remember only the day of the week, for at that time I had no knowledge of the days of the month, nor the months of the year. On setting sail, I walked aft, and gave to Colonel Lloyd's plantation what I hoped would be the last look. I then placed myself in the bows of the sloop, and there spent the remainder of the day in looking ahead, interesting myself in what was in the distance rather than in things nearby or behind." 
"The idea as to how I might learn to write was suggested to me by being in Durgin and Bailey's ship-yard ... When a piece of timber was intended for the larboard side, it would be marked thus –– 'L.' When a piece was for the starboard side, it would be marked thus –– 'S.' A piece for the larboard side forward, would be marked thus –– 'L.F.' When a piece was for starboard side forward, it would be marked thus –– 'S.F.' For larboard aft, it would be marked thus –– 'L.A.' For starboard aft, it would be marked thus –– 'S.A.' I soon learned the names of these letters, and for what they were intended when placed upon a piece of timber in the ship-yard ... During this time, my copy-book was the board fence, brick wall, and pavement; my pen and ink was a lump of chalk. With these, I learned mainly how to write." 
"I sailed from Baltimore for St. Michael's in the sloop Amanda, Captain Edward Dodson. On my passage, I paid particular attention to the direction which the steamboats took to go to Philadelphia. I found, instead of going down, on reaching North Point they went up the bay, in a north-easterly direction. I deemed this knowledge of the utmost importance. My determination to run away was again revived. I resolved to wait only so long as the offering of a favorable opportunity. When that came, I was determined to be off." 
"I was now getting, as I have said, one dollar and fifty cents per day. I contracted for it; I earned it; it was paid to me; it was rightfully my own; yet, upon each returning Saturday night, I was compelled to deliver every cent of that money to Master Hugh. And why? Not because he earned it, –– not because he had any hand in earning it, –– not because I owed it to him, –– nor because he possessed the slightest shadow of a right to it; but solely because he had the power to compel me to give it up. The right of the grim-visaged pirate upon the high seas is exactly the same."
 
"...a fugitive slave in a strange land –– a land given up to be the hunting-ground for slaveholders ... where he is every moment subjected to the terrible liability of being seized upon by his fellowmen, as the hideous crocodile seizes upon his prey! ... feeling as if in the midst of wild beasts, whose greediness to swallow up the trembling and half-famished fugitive is only equalled by that with which the monsters of the deep swallow up the helpless fish upon which they subsist ..."
Douglass was taught that the North was poorer than the South because there were no slaves; slavery was the engine driving the economies of the southern states. Without slave labor, the North must be poor and destitute. But, he saw the truth for himself in coastal towns and states.
"In the afternoon of the day when I reached New Bedford, I visited the wharves, to take a view of the shipping. Here I found myself surrounded with the strongest proofs of wealth. Lying at the wharves, and riding in the stream, I saw many ships of the finest model, in the best order, and of the largest size. Upon the right and left, I was walled in by granite warehouses of the widest dimensions, stowed to their utmost capacity with the necessaries and comforts of life. Added to this, almost every body seemed to be at work, but noiselessly so, compared with what I had been accustomed to in Baltimore." 
"There were no loud songs heard from those engaged in loading and unloading ships. I heard no deep oaths or horrid curses on the laborer. I saw no whipping of men; but all seemed to go smoothly on. Every man appeared to understand his work, and went at it with a sober, yet cheerful earnestness, which betokened the deep interest which he felt in what he was doing, as well as a sense of his own dignity as a man. To me this looked exceedingly strange. From the wharves I strolled around and over the town, gazing with wonder and admiration at the splendid churches, beautiful dwellings, and finely-cultivated gardens; evincing an amount of wealth, comfort, taste, and refinement, such as I had never seen in any part of slaveholding Maryland."
In his "Narrative," written nearly twenty years before the U.S. Civil War, Douglass is careful not to give details of his escape from slavery so as to protect people and methods. But then nearly twenty years after the war, he felt safe to give some details. In "My Escape from Slavery" (1881) we read again of naval and maritime influences and imagery.
"I had a friend –– a sailor –– who owned a sailor's protection, which answered somewhat the purpose of free papers –– describing the person and certifying to the fact that he was a free American sailor. The instrument had at its head the American eagle, which gave it the appearance at once of an authorized document." 
"One element in my favor was the kind feeling which prevailed in Baltimore and other sea-ports at the time, towards 'those who go down to the sea in ships.' 'Free trade and sailors' rights' expressed the sentiment of the country just then. In my clothing I was rigged out in sailor style. I had on a red shirt and a tarpaulin hat and black cravat, tied in sailor fashion, carelessly and loosely about my neck. My knowledge of ships and sailor's talk came much to my assistance, for I knew a ship from stem to stern, and from keelson to cross–trees, and could talk sailor like an 'old salt.'" 
"My free life began on the third of September, 1838. On the morning of the 4th of that month, after an anxious and most perilous but safe journey, I found myself in the big city of New York, a free man; one more added to the mighty throng which like the confused waves of the troubled sea, surged to and fro between the lofty walls of Broadway. Though dazzled with the wonders which met me on every hand, my thoughts could not be much withdrawn from my strange situation. For the moment the dreams of my youth, and the hopes of my manhood, were completely fulfilled ... A new world had opened upon me. If life is more than breath, and the 'quick round of blood,' I lived more in one day than in a year of my slave life. It was a time of joyous excitement which words can but tamely describe ... Anguish and grief, like darkness and rain, may be depicted; but gladness and joy, like the rainbow, defy the skill of pen or pencil." 
"I saw the wisdom of keeping away from the ship-yards, for, if pursued, as I felt certain I would be, Mr. Auld would naturally seek me there among the calkers. Every door seemed closed against me. I was in the midst of an ocean of my fellow-men, and yet a perfect stranger to every one. I was without home, without acquaintance, without money, without credit, without work, and without any definite knowledge as to what course to take, or where to look for succor. In such an extremity, a man has something beside his new-born freedom to think of. While wandering about the streets of New York, and lodging at least one night among the barrels on one of the wharves, I was indeed free –– from slavery, but free from food and shelter as well. I kept my secret to myself as long as I could, but was compelled at last to seek some one who should befriend me, without taking advantage of my destitution to betray me. Such a one I found in a sailor named Stuart, a warm-hearted and generous fellow..."
Sailor Stuart's introductions led to vigilance and abolitionist groups and individuals who helped Douglass make his way from New York to Newport, Rhode Island aboard the steamer John W. Richmond.

Despite all he'd been through Douglass remained humble yet strong. He welcomed the opportunity to work. "There was no work too hard –– none too dirty," he writes near the end of "Narrative." "I was ready to saw wood, shovel coal, carry wood, sweep the chimney, or roll oil casks –– all I did for nearly three years in New Bedford, before I became known to the anti-slavery world."

He found his home there in New Bedford, Massachusetts, and discovered his passion as an abolitionist and orator. He concluded his "Narrative" with this dedication: "Sincerely and earnestly hoping this little book may do something toward throwing light on the American slave system, and hastening the glad day of deliverance to the millions of my brethren in bonds –– faithfully relying on the power of truth, love, and justice..."

Monday, June 15, 2020

Change 'How and How Fast'?

NASA
Review by Bill Doughty

How and how fast humans move to confront climate change is at the core of "The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming" by David Wallace-Wells (Tim Duggan Books, Crown Publishing Group; 2019).

The Aedes Aegypi mosquito can carry the Zika virus. (CDC/James Gathany)
Among the threats of a continually warming planet are disease hot zones and pandemics:
"There are now, trapped in Arctic ice, diseases that have not circulated in the air for millions of years –– in some cases, since before humans were around to encounter them. Which means our immune systems would have no idea how to fight back when those prehistoric plagues emerge from the ice. Already, in laboratories, several microbes have been reanimated..."
The author describes reanimation of bacteria (and a worm) from tens of thousands of years ago, even some microorganisms from millions of years ago. He shows the connection between a warming world and increasing Zika, Lyme disease, malaria, and yellow fever.

Written before Covid-19 was discovered outside of China, "The Uninhabitable Earth" warns of "plagues that climate change will confront us with for the very first time –– a whole new universe of diseases humans have never before known to even worry about ... Scientists guess the planet could harbor more than a million yet-to-be-discovered viruses. Bacteria are even trickier..."

Sunset in southern California during fires, Oct. 23, 2007. CA National Guard.
Wallace-Wells offers the usual dystopian menu of threats: famine, rising ocean levels, floods, unbreathable air, economic collapse, mass extinctions, more destructive storms, greater displacement and migration, and growing conflicts and war.

Countries at risk for conflicts and/or civil war, according to researchers, are Haiti, Pakistan, India, Philippines, Cambodia, and Guatemala.
Climate change represents a growing threat to the U.S. military –– particularly for the Navy –– as water levels rise at some bases and Arctic melting opens new pathways to potential conflict. Some rivals and competitors are taking advantage of the situation even as free nations insist on honoring treaties and freedom of navigation.
"Given the right war-gaming cast of mind, it is also possible to see the aggressive Chinese construction activity in the South China Sea, where whole new artificial islands have been erected for military use, as a kind of dry run, so to speak, for life as a superpower in a flooded world. The strategic opportunity is clear, with so many of the existing footholds –– like all those low-lying islands the United States once used to stepping-stone its own empire across the Pacific –– expected to disappear by the end of the century, if not before. The Marshall Islands archipelago, for instance, seized by the U.S. during World War II, could be rendered uninhabitable by sea-level rise as soon as midcentury, the U.S. Geological Society has warns; its islands will be underwater even if we meet the Paris goals."
Ships and submarines from the Republic of Singapore Navy and U.S. Navy gather in formation in the South China Sea July 21, 2015 during the underway phase of Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) Singapore 2015. CARAT is an annual, bilateral exercise series with the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps and the armed forces of nine partner nations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Joe Bishop/Released)
China could be capitalizing on the changing environment at the same time that it may be slow-walking a green revolution, yet "it does hold nearly all the cards." How –– and how fast –– China will go greener becomes the question:
"How and how fast China manages it own transition from industrial to postindustrial economy, how and how fast it 'greens' the industry that remains, how and how fast it remodels agricultural practices and diet, how and how fast it steers the consumer preferences of its booming middle and upper classes away from carbon intensity –– these are not the only things that will determine the climate shape of the twenty-first century. The courses taken by India and the rest of South Asia, Nigeria and rest of sub-Saharan Africa, matter enormously. But China is, at present, the largest of those nations, and by far the wealthiest and most powerful. Through its Belt and Road Initiative, the country has already positioned itself as a major provider, in some cases the major provider, of the infrastructure of industry, energy, and transportation in much of the rest of the developing world. And it is relatively easy to imagine, at the end of a Chinese century, an intuitive global consensus solidifying –– that the country with the world's largest economy (therefore most responsible for the energy output of the planet) and the most people (therefore most responsible for the public health and well-being of humanity) should have something more than narrowly national powers over the climate policy of the rest of the 'community of nations,' who would fall into line behind it."
Global warming, like a pandemic, does not respect walls or borders.

"No human has ever lived on a planet as hot as this one; it will get hotter," Wallace-Wells writes.

Unless the human race as a community of nations faces the threat, the world will cross a tipping point. Already, 96 percent of the world's mammals by weight are either humans or domesticated animals (livestock or pets); only 4 percent are still wild. We see a mass die-off of bees from the world's ecosystem. A dead honeybee is featured on the cover of "The Uninhabitable Earth."

"The arrival of this scale of climate suffering in the modern West will be one of the great and terrible stories of the coming decades," Wallace-Wells says, describing the "Anthropocene" era. "There, at least, we've long thought that modernity had paved over nature, completely, factory by factory and strip mall by strip mall."

Great minds have identified the threats and outlined solutions. Here's what we need to do as individuals and nations: control population, reduce fossil fuels including with a carbon tax, incentivize use of green technologies, phase out dirty energy, consider new approaches to agriculture and diet, and invest in carbon capture. Although the Navy has embraced a need go green –– seeing clearly the threats of climate change and global warming –– some people still reject science, deny reality and resist change.

Green technology: Lance Cpl. James Russell, an electrician with Combat Logistics Battalion 3, 3rd Marine Logistics Group, explains how he and other Marines operate MAGS (Micro Auto Gasification System) at Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan 25, 2013. The system was tested as a waste disposal solution during Lava Viper, a Marine Corps field training exercise. Processing about 50 pounds of solid waste per hour, MAGS is capable of handling the daily waste disposal needs of approximately 1,000 troops, converting 95 percent of the waste to gas, which is then used to fuel the process. (Photo by Cpl. Ben Eberle)
Wallace-Wells presents a wealth of information on many levels and refers to an enlightened group of authors and thinkers including Albert Einstein, Joseph Conrad, Paul Ehrlich, Jared Diamond, E.O. Wilson, H.G. Wells, Steven Pinker, Bill McKibben, and Yuval Noah Harari.

Harari, author of "Sapiens," explains the resistance to action against climate change because of humans' belief in myths. We often fail to react to gradual threats only when our paradigms are shattered.

An example of this phenomenon –– a sudden shattering of a paradigm –– may be seen in the widespread realization this month that systemic racism still exists in some areas of society and cannot be tolerated.
NASA



As for reclaiming a habitable Earth, will global citizens again rise and come together? In the midst of this pandemic, will we have a similar revelation and awakening regarding the need for global change? To use Wallace-Wells's words: "How and how fast?"

Thursday, June 11, 2020

The Right to Protest & the Courage to Admit Mistakes

by Bill Doughty
CJCS Gen. Milley, Dec. 14, 2019 (Photo by Sgt. Dana Clarke)

In a pre-recorded speech to a group of graduates of the National Defense University today, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley spoke of "dynamic and uncertain times." He outlined global threats and challenges before focusing on an "especially intense and trying time for America" over the past several weeks.

"I am outraged by the senseless and brutal killing of George Floyd. His death amplified the pain, the frustration, and the fear that so many of our fellow Americans live with day in, day out," Milley said. "The protests that have ensued not only speak to his killing, but also to the centuries of injustice toward African Americans. 

Milley recognized the context marches in the streets. “The protests that have ensued not only speak to his killing, but also to the centuries of injustice toward African-Americans. What we are seeing is the long shadow of our original sin in Jamestown 401 years ago, liberated by the Civil War, but not equal in the eyes of the law until 100 years later in 1965."

"We are still struggling with racism and we have much work to do. Racism and discrimination, structural preferences, patterns of mistreatment, [and] unspoken and unconscious bias have no place in America and they have no place in our Armed Forces. We must, we can, and we will do better."

The military has led the nation's efforts toward greater equality and integration throughout American History, especially in the aftermath of wars and during the height of the civil rights movement in the 60s and early 70s. Demands for social justice, good law enforcement and equal rights under the law have been reignited in 2020. This can be a force for unity or division.



Milley called for unity and said, "And we should all be proud that the vast majority of protests have been peaceful. Peaceful protest means that American freedom is working." He recognized the good work of the National Guard, working with governors and local officials, and he reiterated DoD's commitment to diversity and improving representation, especially at the highest ranks.

Milley recommitted to improving diversity through active mentorship, teamwork and leadership. "Equality and opportunity is a matter of readiness. It's the basis of cohesion."

True strength comes from admitting an error. Milley said he was wrong to participate in the June 1 photo-op with President Trump, in which peaceful protesters were assaulted. And he reminded graduates –– and military personnel –– of their oath to support and defend the Constitution.

Then Army Chief of Staff Gen. Milley addresses troops at Joint Base Lewis-McCord, July 23, 2018. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Michael Armstrong)

"Let me conclude with two simple pieces of advice based on 40 years in uniform that you may find useful as many of you will surely go on to become flag officers.

"First, always maintain a keen sense of situational awareness. As senior leaders, everything you do will be closely watched, and I am not immune. As many of you saw the result of the photograph of me at Lafayette Square last week, that sparked a national debate about the role of the military in civil society. I should not have been there. My presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics.

"As a commissioned uniformed officer, it was a mistake that I have learned from, and I sincerely hope we all can learn from it."

Milley said, "My second piece of advice is very simple: Embrace the Constitution. Keep it close to your heart. It is our North Star. It is our map to a better future." The U.S. Constitution is in the Canon section of the Navy Professional Reading Program.

Milley told the National Defense University graduates, "All of us in uniform are willing to die for that idea, the idea that is America. And so we must also be willing to live for that idea, for freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom to peacefully assemble. And freedom to vote and freedom to believe as you wish in your religion.

"These are essential freedoms that are the cornerstone of our country. Americans have spilled their blood to protect them in the past and they continue to be worth fighting for. This we will defend."

Chief Petty Officer selectees (sailors who have been selected for promotion to E-7) work together Aug. 29, 2019 during chief heritage weeks aboard USS Constitution, the “oldest commissioned warship afloat in the world." (Photo by Casey Scoular/Released)

Friday, June 5, 2020

'To Unite Around a Common Purpose'

Trump and Mattis
By Bill Doughty––

This week, former Secretary of Defense retired Marine Corps General James Mattis spoke out against President Trump's threat to deploy militarized force against Americans peacefully protesting as part of their rights as guaranteed in the first amendment to the Constitution. 

In in op-ed for Foreign Policy and statement for other media outlets, Mattis wrote, "We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law." Protests throughout the United States and overseas are in the wake of the death of George Floyd, an African American, highlighting the need for greater equality and systemic police reforms.

Mattis joins a chorus of voices of respected leaders who are speaking out against misuse of the military and abuse of power by the commander in chief and his key staff. 

Trump –– along with his attorney general, secretary of defense and chairman of joint chiefs –– directed force be used to attack and remove peaceful protestors in and near Lafayette Park June 1 so the president could pose for pictures while holding a bible. Last week, Trump tweeted, "...Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts."

Prior to the photo-op, Trump spoke at the White House and threatened to "deploy the United States military" if mayors and governors didn't take brutal action to "dominate the streets." 

"As we speak," he said, "I am dispatching thousands and thousands of heavily armed soldiers, military personnel, and law enforcement officers to stop the rioting, looting, vandalism, assaults, and the wanton destruction of property."

Earlier in the day Trump held a phone call with governors in which he said, "General Milley is here, who's head of joint chiefs of staff, a fighter, a warrior, had a lot of victories and no losses ... And I just put him in charge." SECDEF Esper then told the governors, "We need to dominate the battle space."

In his op-ed, "In Union There Is Strength," Mattis wrote: "We must reject any thinking of our cities as a 'battlespace' that our uniformed military is called upon to 'dominate.' At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict —a false conflict — between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part."

Mullen
His statement comes on the heels of a similar statement by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff retired Navy Admiral Mike Mullen, published by The Atlantic the day after the incident in Lafayette Park. In an essay titled "I Cannot Remain Silent," Mullen wrote: "Our fellow citizens are not the enemy, and must never become so."

Mullen, a respected military leader, served as CNO and then as CJCS under both President George W. Bush and President Obama.

Mullen wrote, in part: "While no one should ever condone the violence, vandalism, and looting that has exploded across our city streets, neither should anyone lose sight of the larger and deeper concerns about institutional racism that have ignited this rage ... We must, as citizens, address head-on the issue of police brutality and sustained injustices against the African American community. We must, as citizens, support and defend the right—indeed, the solemn obligation—to peacefully assemble and to be heard. These are not mutually exclusive pursuits. And neither of these pursuits will be made easier or safer by an overly aggressive use of our military, active duty or National Guard."

Mullen’s successor as Joint Chiefs chairman, Army Gen. (ret.) Martin Dempsey, tweeted this week, “America is not a battleground. Our fellow citizens are not the enemy. #BeBetter.” Also speaking out on Twitter were retired Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and NSA, and retired Gen. Tony Thomas, former head of Special Operations Command.

McRaven and Ash Carter
This morning, Adm. William H. McRaven, who served as the ninth commander of the United States Special Operations Command (2011-2014), spoke out on the "Morning Joe" show: “I was very pleased to see Jim Mattis, and obviously Adm. Mike Mullen, and today John Kelly come out and reinforce what we know to be the principles of the U.S. military,” McRaven said. “We all raise our right hand and swear an oath to the Constitution of the United States, it is not to the president of the United States, it is to the Constitution.”

“When you are in the military, there are three criteria for every decision we make: it has to be moral, legal and ethical,” McRaven said. “Ethical –– you have to follow the rules, legal –– you have to follow the law, and then moral –– you have to follow what you know to be right. And either way, that’s just not right.”

Allen
“You’re not going to use, whether it’s the military, or the National Guard, or law enforcement, to clear peaceful American citizens for the president of the United States to do a photo op,” McRaven said. “There is nothing morally right about that.”

Marine Corps General (ret.) John Allen, former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, wrote in Foreign Policy this week, "To even the casual observer, Monday was awful for the United States and its democracy. The president's speech (calling for military deployment on American streets) was calculated to project his abject and arbitrary power, but he failed to project any of the higher emotions or leadership desperately needed in every quarter of this nation during this dire moment."

Among other leaders of character who are standing up and expressing their outrage about the events of June 1 is Steven J. Lepper, a retired Air Force major general, who served as Deputy Legal Counsel to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Lepper wrote a thoughtful piece for The Hill about issuing and following unlawful orders and preventing misuse of the military.

Lepper
"Even before Monday," Lepper writes, "(Trump) has spent much of his time lavishing praise on the military, hailing himself as its savior, or pandering to it in ways that many have found embarrassing and, in some cases, abhorrent. Rather than treating the military as the professional organization it is and the element of national power it was intended to be, he seems to want it to be his friend. How else can anyone explain why he pardoned three accused American war criminals? By his own admission, he sought to shield these men — and, by extension, the rest of the military — from accountability on the battlefield. His 'I got your back' message was actually a slap in the face of every military professional who knows that right and wrong exist in combat."

Former defense secretaries Leon Panetta, Ash Carter and Chuck Hagel joined 86 other former Pentagon leaders in an open letter published in the Washington Post today. Yesterday, former SECDEF William Perry tweeted, "I am outraged at the deplorable behavior of our President and Defense Secretary Esper, threatening to use American military forces to suppress peaceful demonstrators exercising their constitutional rights. This is a deeply shameful moment for our nation."

Panetta and Stavridis
Navy Admiral (ret.) James Stavridis, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, wrote an essay for Time, saying, "The sweeping use of a combined civil-military force – D.C. police, Park Police, National Guard, and active duty military police – against the protesters to clear the way for a Presidential photo-op was beyond the pale of American norms. It was particularly ill-advised to include active duty military personnel in that event."

As usual, Stavridis puts recent events in the context of history: "Our founding fathers feared the use of a standing army that could be used to further the aims of a dictator."

"Our active duty military must remain above the fray of domestic politics, and the best way to do that is to keep that force focused on its rightful mission outside the United States," Stavridis writes. "Our senior active duty military leaders must make that case forcefully and directly to national leadership, speaking truth to power in uncomfortable ways. They must do this at the risk of their career. I hope they will do so, and not allow the military to be dragged into the maelstrom that is ahead of us, and which will likely only accelerate between now and November. If they do not stand and deliver on this vital core value, I fear for the soul of our military and all of the attendant consequences. We cannot afford to have a future Lafayette Square end up looking like Tiananmen Square."

In the book, "Civilian Control of the Military: Theory and Cases from Developing Countries," ed. by Claude E. Welch Jr. (State University of New York Press, Albany 1976), Welch warns against using the military in domestic civilian affairs. "Domestic violence tries the loyalty of the military to the government." Steps must be taken, he says, to "foster restraint on the part of civilian leaders." 

The book opens with advice from nearly two hundred years ago. General Maria von Clausewitz wrote that war is an instrument of state policy by an armed force created by the state, in our nation's case by "we, the people." Clausewitz writes what Welch calls "perhaps the strongest justification for civilian control over the military:
"The subordination of the political point of view to the military would be contrary to common sense, for policy has declared the war; it is the intelligent faculty, war only the instrument, and not the reverse. The subordination of the military point of view to the political is, therefore, the only thing which is possible."
Welch says that, in order to sustain civilian control over the armed forces, "Civilian politicians should follow policies of restraint in periods of domestic crisis." Policing should be left to police, including to quell the relatively few unfortunate violent and destructive acts in some cities. Also, Americans are smart enough to realize both: (1) the vast majority of law enforcement people are good and often heroic, and (2) due to systemic problems, there needs to be a fundamental reshaping of how "protect and serve" is carried out.

Mattis
Mattis's op-ed, like Mullen's and Stavridis's, leans heavily on history: "Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that "The Nazi slogan for destroying us...was 'Divide and Conquer.' Our American answer is 'In Union there is Strength.' We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics."

Mattis concludes, "We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another. The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community. Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country. We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Square. We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution. At the same time, we must remember Lincoln's 'better angels,' and listen to them, as we work to unite."