Saturday, August 26, 2023

Read Their Eyes

By Bill Doughty––


Former United States Marine Harrison Floyd is still in jail after being charged last week in the Fulton County case with violating Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. He is charged with influencing a witness and conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements, specifically against Fulton County election worker Ruby Freeman. Floyd is the only one of 19 defendants who was not granted bail; a judge ruled he was a potential flight risk.


Former Commander in Chief Donald J. Trump allegedly led efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Other defendants are charged with assisting the former president and/or each other in subverting the election in violation of the U.S. Constitution. All are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Over the summer, we posted several updates to criminal indictments, particularly when there was a connection with the military and/or the Constitution. We recommended the indictments as historic summer reading. The Fulton County indictment is back-to-school season heavy reading, but is recommended as we continue to live through historic times. We can also read the eyes of some of the defendants in the case:


Meadows
Eastman
Giuliani
Cheseboro
Clark
Powell
Roman
Smith
Kutti
Hall
Lee
Still
One wonders what is going on behind the eyes of the alleged conspirators and followers –– including a former Marine and a Christian pastor –– allegedly part of a coup attempt and subversion of the Constitution.

What are they thinking now as they face possible imprisonment? What choices will they make in the weeks and months ahead? What did they believe that led them allegedly to commit their crimes?

Fulton County mugshots of 19 co-conspirators alleged to have tried to subvert the 2020 election.

And what will be the actions of their followers and believers, including those who support the January 6, 2021 insurrection and attempted coup?

Friday, August 11, 2023

Found Haiku in 'Believer'

Review by Bill Doughty––

Did the pilot encounter a UFO before losing contact with air traffic control? What do people, including his fiancé, believe happened to Frederick Valentich on Saturday, October 21, 1978, over Bass Strait, Australia? And what did Valentich report he saw and experienced just before his transmission cut off, the pilot never to be heard from alive again?


It’s one of the true stories explored by master writer Sarah Krasnostein in “The Believer: Encounters with the Beginning, the End, and Our Place in the Middle” (Tin House, 2022).

In “The Believer” we meet UFOlogists, an abuse survivor who hired a hitman, members of a Mennonite choir who perform in a New York subway, a “death doula” who helps individuals and families, ghost hunters who search for evidence in haunted places, a geologist who wants to believe the earth is 6,000 years old, and others following and sharing their beliefs. Throughout, Krasnostein presents characters in ways that make us care about them. The sometimes floating, sometimes strobe-like stories are often deeply painful but always thought-provoking, poetic and profound.


Her writing unfolds the biggest of issues: life, death, hope, reality, existentialism.


“From the absurdity of our deepest paranoias to the radical coherency of our highest art, we are compulsive converters of fact into meaning.”


UAP screen shot by a naval aviator (U.S. Navy)
She visits the Creation Museum in California, discusses the cantina scene in Star Wars, shares the beauty of Wynton Marsalis’s “Canon for Three Trumpets and Strings,” and considers the science of oneness and shared atoms with religious fundamentalists, noting, “…they believe I am going to Hell, and I believe they may already be living in one…”

This is a book of fascinating encounters and deeply personal contemplation.


As if taking a book from a library shelf, Krasnostein quotes works by great minds such as Hanna Arendt and her “warning against mistaking knowledge for thought, and truth for meaning;” Haruki Murakami who contemplates “existential reality of nonexistence;” and Martin Rees’s observation that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” (now pertinent to discussion of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, including recent revelations by U.S. military pilots and former naval aviators).


She spotlights Alvin Toffler, author of “Future Shock,” who in 1970 identified “the dizzying disorientation brought on by the premature arrival of the future.”Midway in the last century telephones were just for calling people. Computers were the size of large rooms. TVs had three channels –– all black-and-white, mostly white. 


Krasnostein writes about some of the people in their early sixties and late fifties who experienced Toffler's future shock: “Over the span of their lives to date, LP records disappeared and then cassettes. Reel-to-reel, Beta, VHS. Carbon copies, typewriter ribbons. The black tongue of film inside a camera, every frame precious.”


Ahhh, an unexpected “found haiku” –– a five-seven-five-syllable stanza of words. Poignant. Exquisite. Unintentionally a poem:


…ribbons. The black tongue

of film inside a camera,

every frame precious


Other found haiku emerge as we read Krasnostein’s investigation of religion, alien abductions, and other beliefs.


She investigates UFO sightings, events, and conspiracies in Australia, including the Westall event of 1966. She visits with a sect of fundamentalist Christians in their homes and at their services, including in the dead of winter. She befriends a dying woman and her family, who allow her to share in the process of saying goodbye. And she follows the life of a convicted repentant murderer who helps homeless people stay alive.


Some found haiku in "The Believer":


Green-white flash moving

extremely quickly across

the sky. Metallic…


Over long winters

of short days when nothing thawed

or melted away


The railing is iced

with a thin line of fresh snow

as I climb the stairs


Through which a chill wind

blew: grief frustration closer

to strangulation


Inside, I add my

wet Nikes to the dozens

of similar pairs


On the sofa where

they lean towards each other like

a pair of old boots


Air is cold through the

clean pane as he looks up at 

the blackness he knows


Of the clock face laid

bare as each hour came once, and

vanished forever


Salting of stars so

thick it reminded me we

are floating in space


How close the remote

past is: we live inside it

the light is the same


Self … rumination

carving neurological

tracks deep as canyons


Krasnostein examines the choices we make in our noble but vain attempt to find answers to every question. She sees how some believers accept certain inevitabilities. Reaching for more books, she cites other authors and thinkers, including Elizabeth Kübler Ross, Stephen J. Gould, George Orwell, Charles Darwin, James Baldwin, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Jorge Luis Borges. Borges imagined Paradise “as a kind of library,” one that Krasnostein contemplates visiting.


“...I always imagined that library as an Eden where all the operating instructions are filed. Not only all the books ever written, but also each of our stories: the past meeting the future, everything indexed and logically related, a return to when the world was as seamless and whole as an apple. I suppose this reflected a belief in the world as a certain kind of text; a faith that, if I could only ask the right questions, I could finally understand.

“To believe in the world as this type of text is to believe that all lives –– regardless of whether they resolve happily –– make sense. To have faith in context and causation. To insist that people for the most part are intelligibly coherent in the sense of being predictably inconsistent and that they are capable, within reasonable bounds, of incredible insight and meaningful growth as they learn, painfully, to bend themselves around reality instead of expecting reality to miraculously bend itself around them.”


To have such an exquisite belief about people, she says, is just wrong. But adds, “what other choice do we have?”

Hannah Arendt is a touchstone in "Believer." Especially Arendt's "The Life of the Mind" "in which she explored the powers and limitations of our cognitive function. Arendt believed that every civilization is founded on the capacity to ask unanswerable questions. Krasnostein says, "In other words, our social survival –– even our physical survival –– is bound up with our spiritual survival and it might rely, as a matter of first principles, more on the aspirations underlying our questions and our ability to tolerate uncertainty than on our proficiency at defending solutions just for the sake of having them."

Could it be that commonality in our very atoms and shared place in space and time here "in the middle" is more profound than superficial differences –– despite indoctrination, amygdala influence, and ego issues?

I couldn’t help but notice that the subtitle of this wonderful book is, itself, a found haiku:


Encounters with the

beginning, the end, and our

place in the middle


(We have featured Navy Reads posts with other found haiku over the years, including from President Abraham Lincoln and Senator John S. McCain.)

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Another Heated Indictment; What About First Amendment?

By Bill Doughty–

In June we said the top summer read is not a book. It is the short, free, and compelling indictment of the former president and his valet, former Navy CSCS Waltine Nauta for taking, concealing, and lying about classified documents, including military and intelligence secrets.


It an uncomfortable but necessary read for anyone interested in national security, protecting the rule of law, and accountability for those who violate the Constitution. The original indictment was updated with a superseding indictment last week that included more details and another defendant, valet Carlos De Oliveira.


Now there is another, perhaps even more important late-summer “must-read”: the second federal indictment of former President Donald J. Trump, unveiled by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, this time for conspiracies to defraud the United States, obstruct an official proceeding, and prevent rights to vote and have votes counted; as well as the “obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding.”


Arguably, it is not just a right but also a duty for every citizen to read this latest indictment, which refers to Trump as the Defendant. While Trump has the expectation and right to a presumption of innocence until his guilt is proven, this indictment shows a lot of evidence of smoke. And where there is smoke…


Constitutional Duty


Military service members, federal employees, elected lawmakers, and national leaders take an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution, so the indictment has special relevance to them.


It narrates the details and presents some of the evidence of the Defendant’s efforts, along with co-conspirators to change the results of the 2020 presidential election by disseminating knowingly false claims designed to “create an intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the election.”


“Shortly after election day, the Defendant also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results.”


The indictment lists several conspiracies as well as the relevant laws Trump violated. “Each of these conspiracies –– which built on the widespread mistrust the Defendant was creating through pervasive and destabilizing lies about election fraud –– targeted a bedrock function of the United States federal government: the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election (‘the federal government function’).”


Efforts to subvert the election culminated on January 6, 2021, when Trump and some of his co-conspirators assembled, riled up, and then aimed a mob of protesters toward the U.S. Capitol. Many members of the mob violently assaulted law enforcement officers and sought to assassinate Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Vice President Mike Pence, and others. Their ultimate goal was to stop the counting of electoral votes that would show the results of the election.


“This federal government function –– from the point of ascertainment to the certification –– is foundational to the United States’ democratic process and until 2021, had operated in a peaceful and orderly manner for more than 130 years,” Special Prosecutor Jack Smith writes.


The United States Constitution is mentioned several times in the indictment.


Where There Is Smoke…


Lawyers and apologists for the former president have said that Trump had a First Amendment freedom-of-speech right under the Constitution to say anything he wanted to say.


Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson (1892-1954) called the First Amendment’s right to free speech a “fixed star in our constitutional constellation.” However, the Supreme Court has determined their are limits to speech, especially when crimes and violence are involved.


Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (1841-1935) wrote, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” Later, Holmes called for a “clear and present danger” test, writing, “it is only the present danger of immediate evil or an intent to bring it about that warrants Congress in setting a limit to the expression of opinion where private rights are not concerned.”


Considering the violence of J6, in which several people were killed, lawmakers were threatened, and a coup was attempted, one could argue that the First Amendment freedom-of-speech clause does not apply. In fact, Smith addresses the issue in the third paragraph of the indictment, noting “The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election…”


The question is not about speech, but about actions. And just because an attempted coup was not successful, it does not abrogate the crime of attempting one. In Holmes’s example of the sin of shouting fire in a crowded theatre, there doesn’t have to be an actual fire for such an act to be a crime.


Trump is being arrested and arraigned today in the federal courthouse in Washington D.C., the same courthouse where more than one hundred J6 insurrectionists have been arraigned.